Québec EditionCivil law · Barreau du Québec
Other editions
Antigua and BarbudaArgentinaBahamasBarbadosBelizeBoliviaBrazilCanadaChileColombiaCosta RicaCubaDominicaDominican RepublicEcuadorEl SalvadorGrenadaGuatemalaGuyanaHaitiHondurasJamaicaMexicoNicaraguaPanamaParaguayPeruSaint Kitts and NevisSaint LuciaSaint Vincent and the GrenadinesSurinameTrinidad and TobagoUnited StatesUruguayVenezuelaAlbaniaAndorraArmeniaAustriaAzerbaijanBelarusBelgiumBosnia and HerzegovinaBulgariaCroatiaCyprusCzechiaDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGeorgiaGermanyGreeceHungaryIcelandIrelandItalyKazakhstanKosovoLatviaLiechtensteinLithuaniaLuxembourgMaltaMoldovaMonacoMontenegroNetherlandsNorth MacedoniaNorwayPolandPortugalRomaniaRussiaSan MarinoSerbiaSlovakiaSloveniaSpainSwedenSwitzerlandTürkiyeUkraineUnited KingdomVatican CityAlgeriaAngolaBeninBotswanaBurkina FasoBurundiCabo VerdeCameroonCentral African RepublicChadComorosRepublic of the CongoDemocratic Republic of the CongoCôte d'IvoireDjiboutiEgyptEquatorial GuineaEritreaEswatiniEthiopiaGabonGambiaGhanaGuineaGuinea-BissauKenyaLesothoLiberiaLibyaMadagascarMalawiMaliMauritaniaMauritiusMoroccoMozambiqueNamibiaNigerNigeriaRwandaSão Tomé and PríncipeSenegalSeychellesSierra LeoneSomaliaSouth AfricaSouth SudanSudanTanzaniaTogoTunisiaUgandaZambiaZimbabweAfghanistanUnited Arab EmiratesBangladeshBahrainBhutanBruneiChinaIndonesiaIsraelIndiaIraqIranJordanJapanKyrgyzstanCambodiaNorth KoreaSouth KoreaKuwaitLaosLebanonSri LankaMyanmarMongoliaMaldivesMalaysiaNepalOmanPhilippinesPakistanPalestineQatarSaudi ArabiaSingaporeSyriaThailandTajikistanTimor-LesteTurkmenistanTaiwanUzbekistanVietnamYemenAustraliaFijiMicronesiaKiribatiMarshall IslandsNauruNew ZealandPapua New GuineaPalauSolomon IslandsTongaTuvaluVanuatuSamoaAnguillaAntarcticaAmerican SamoaArubaÅland IslandsSaint BarthélemyBermudaCaribbean NetherlandsBouvet IslandCocos (Keeling) IslandsCook IslandsCuraçaoChristmas IslandWestern SaharaFalkland IslandsFaroe IslandsFrench GuianaGuernseyGibraltarGreenlandGuadeloupeSouth Georgia and the South Sandwich IslandsGuamHong KongHeard Island and McDonald IslandsIsle of ManBritish Indian Ocean TerritoryJerseyCayman IslandsSaint MartinMacaoNorthern Mariana IslandsMartiniqueMontserratNew CaledoniaNorfolk IslandNiueFrench PolynesiaSaint Pierre and MiquelonPitcairn IslandsPuerto RicoRéunionSaint Helena, Ascension and Tristan da CunhaSvalbard and Jan MayenSint MaartenTurks and Caicos IslandsFrench Southern TerritoriesTokelauUnited States Minor Outlying IslandsBritish Virgin IslandsU.S. Virgin IslandsWallis and FutunaMayotte

Traduction en Tłı̨chǫ révisée par des traducteurs des communautés — jamais par traduction automatique — et en cours. Les sections non traduites s'affichent en français. · Tłı̨chǫ translation is human-reviewed by translators from the communities — never machine translation — and in progress; untranslated sections appear in French.

Le français est la langue officielle de Juge.ca. En cas de divergence, d'ambiguïté, d'omission ou de conflit d'interprétation, la version française prévaut.

Legal workflow technologyAccess to justice

Legal workflow technology: design principles for access-to-justice tools

Juge.ca Research (Juge.ca)

Permalink: JUGE.2026.003 · Published 2026-06-17

Technology can lower the cost of organizing a legal matter, but only if it is designed for non-experts. We set out practical design principles for legal-workflow tools that aim to widen access without overstepping into legal advice.

What workflow technology can and cannot do

Workflow tools are good at structure: capturing events in date order, linking documents to facts, tracking deadlines, and producing a clean record. That structure is exactly what people without representation struggle to build under stress.

Tools should not pretend to be lawyers. The line between organizing information and giving legal advice is a design constraint, not an afterthought — especially given unauthorized-practice-of-law rules.

Design principles

Plain language first; bilingual by default in Canadian contexts. Make deadlines and their sources explicit. Keep evidence separate from argument. Preserve originals. Be transparent about limits and route users to licensed help when risk is high.

Privacy by design matters: minimize data, isolate sensitive material, and never require people to disclose privileged content to receive general information.

Scope and disclaimer

This is research and educational material on tool design. It is general information, not legal advice, and not an endorsement of any specific product.

References

  1. Canadian Forum on Civil Justice, “Cost of Justice” research program.
  2. Action Committee on Access to Justice in Civil and Family Matters, “Roadmap for Change” (2013).

Licence & attribution

Published under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0). Authors retain copyright. Reuse permitted with attribution.

Commencer mon dossier